Archive for the ‘commercial property insurance’ Category

Commercial property insurance – flat roofs

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

Chances are that if you have a commercial property insurance policy in force, there will be a condition or warranty relating to any non-standard constructed roofs. If your property or properties have a normal pitched roof covered with slates or tiles, then this does not apply. However, if part or all of your roof is flat, then you need to exercise care as to what exactly is, or is not, covered by your policy.

Most policies will provide the usual  range of perils such as storm, flood, fire, theft, burst pipes etc. But, properties that have flat roofs are usually more susceptible to certain types of loss than a traditional roof.

Concrete roofs are not so bad. You do not see many of them nowadays (in new builds) but throughout the 70’s and 80’s this was a popular form of construction because it was quick and sturdy. What insurers are concerned about is flat roofs that can, over time, deteriorate in condition. We are particularly talking about felt or asphalt on top of timber. In the main, this type of construction was used on extensions as opposed to the whole roof on a new build. There are many properties though where the whole property is roofed with felt on timber.

If you are receiving rental income on the property, or you occupy the property yourself (for your trade) then you will have arranged a policy through a business insurance broker. 9 times out of 10, the policy will have been sold based on price. The cheaper the policy though, the more careful you need to look at the conditions and/or warranties.

For example, you may have a standard business insurance policy which has a nice, low, £100 excess. But, if you look carefully, any losses attributable to the flat roof may be subject to a significantly higher excess. £500 is the norm and this can rise to £750. This means that for every loss relating to the flat roof, you will pay a huge chunk of any claim, if not all of it. Also, the policy may state that you need to have the roof inspected every year, or bi-annually, by a competent contractor (ie not yourself) and any defects remedied.

This covers three points. Firstly, the increased excess may make the cheaper policy youhave bought not such a good deal. Secondly, the cost of getting a contractor even to look at a roof can be a few hundred pounds and thirdly, you will need to provide written evidence that you have had the roof inspected within the last twelve months. So you cannot get away from the additional costs.

All in all, it may seem like a good deal to get a cheaper premium, but as we always point out, the devil is in the detail.

Commercial property insurance – temporary unoccupany

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

If you have a commercial building insurance policy in force, the premium and cover will be based on a number of factors. One of these is the type of occupancy. As you can imagine, a building that is occupied as a fish and chip shop or woodworker is going to present a higher risk of fire loss than an office.

Insurers will either charge a higher premium, to reflect the increased risk, or apply terms (such as having all dirt and grease removed from takeaway ducting every month).

When a tenant leaves a property there is usually going to be a gap between when one business is trading and the next one starts. This can either be whilst you are awaiting new tenants or whilst there is a shop re-fit undertaken. You could be faced with months and months when the building is empty, given the tough economic times. There are estimates that 15% of the existing Woolworths store premises are still empty, nearly two years after the companies demise.

Your policy wording, as with all business insurance, will have certain terms, conditions and excesses. One of the conditions will relate to what happens to the cover when a building is empty for 30 days or more. Usually, if aa building is empty, un-tenanted or vacant for more than a month, there are fairly onerous cover restrictions.

You will find that your glass, storm, burst pipes or theft cover is excluded. The reason is that insurers, from experience, suffer more losses on unoccupied properties than they do tenanted ones.

You need to check your policy wording to see what terms apply if your building is going to be empty for any length of time.

Subsidence – make sure you have adequate cover.

Monday, July 19th, 2010

Since the terrible summer of 2007 and the floods across the country we have not had such dry weather. 2008 and 2009, whilst not so bad, were hardly the summers we remember from the past.

No-one will forget the Met Office announcing with great fanfare that 2009 was going to be a “barbecue summer”, only to state 5 months later that this was only a 60% prediction, which of course was wrong.

As a result of this, the business insurance companies, that insure buildings and properties, have seen a marked dip in claims for subsidence over the past four or five years.

We have had cracking weather in 2010 so far, a few blips of course, but the “phew what a scorcher” headlines have been justified. Whilst we have had a good summer, we have also had a very dry winter. A lot of snow of course, but this has not soaked through to the soil under our houses and businesses.

We are starting to see an increase in claims under business building insurance for cracks in the actual structure. The causes of subsidence are many, the main ones being a simple draining of soil, which results in shrinkage which cracks the structure and tree roots, in search of moisture, drying out surrounding soil.

With the advent of websites that “offer” to compare business insurance, as they are price driven, there is an increase in quotes being provided at a very basic level. What this means is that people are getting quotes without subsidence, because it can be 10 or 20% cheaper.

This will start to be a problem as people start to have claims and then realise that there is no cover in place. The first thing you should do is speak to a business insurance broker and get them to review all of your insurance requirements, one of them being the cover you have. Secondly, if you do not have subsidence, heave or landslip (the 3 main covers) either get this added to your policy or take out a new one with this, vital, cover.

Commercial building insurance – fixed glass and sanitary-ware

Friday, June 18th, 2010

Anyone who has purchased, and made a claim, on a business insurance policy will know that the actual policy wording can take a while to interpret.

Certain sections appear to exclude cover, because later in the policy wording this particular part of the cover is “bought back in”. It is not a deliberate attempt to confuse or deceive (contrary to what some might say), it is just the nature of the beast. The wording needs to be read, in conjunction with your insurance schedule, and in it’s entirety for you to fully understand what is, and is not included.

When looking at commercial property insurance, you want to make sure that you are covered for most types of claims. There are certain types of claims, such as arson by the property owner, which of course cannot be covered. But, there are differences between a basic policy wording and a more comprehensive policy.

One of the additional covers you can, and should have, is for fixed glass. If you are the property owner and you lease the premises, then under the terms of your lease your tenant will usually be responsible for insuring the shop front glass. However, this is not always the case, particularly if it is your business that occupies the building, or it is a residential let.

This post is about sanitary ware, this includes sinks, showers and toilets, effectively the fixed contents in any bathroom. Not all policies include this, whereas the cost of fixing a cracked bath, particularly if it is a difficult to obtain colour, can be very expensive.

This tends to be more of an issue with block of flats insurance, than if you own a high street premises, but you are always wise to check that you have cover in place.

Commercial building insurance – index linked sum insured?

Saturday, April 17th, 2010

Most commercial insurance policies that cover business buildings will have some form of index-linking built in at renewal. What this means is that each year a certain percentage is applied to your sum insured to increase this to ensure that, over time, inflation does not erode the suitability of the sum insured.

With commercial property insurance you, the policyholder, must ensure that the amount that the building is insured for is adequate. For example, if a building costs £500,000 to purchase, the rebuilding cost could be less or more depending on the age of the building, the construction materials and where it is. In certain parts of the country, even after the recession, up to 40% of the purchase cost of some buildings refers just to the value of the land (with permission for residential/commercial use) it sits on.

If you insure for the incorrect amount (too low) then your claim payments could be reduced, although you do get a 10-20% margin of error with most insurers. If you have had a commercial building insurance policy that fell due for renewal recently, you may have found that the sum insured has not been index-linked. This is a consequence of the price crash over the past 18-24 months. Rebuilding costs always lag behind and insurers have, for a few months, not increased sums insured. This is likely to change very shortly and sums insured will increase again.

What you do need to do is to review your sum insured every year. Forget about the figures on your insurance schedule and work out yourself what the rebuilding cost is likely to be.  A really basic rule of thumb for standard construction, post 1900, commercial premises is £100 per square foot. If your sum insured is less than this amount, you should speak to your broker to get this changed. The caveat is, that this is no more than a guide and you should always consult a professional surveyor or valuer if you want to ascertain the correct rebuilding cost.

Commercial buildings insurance – loss of rent cover

Friday, February 12th, 2010

In 2010, we are finally seeing, what Norman Lamont would describe as, the green shoots of recovery.

Time is a great healer, rather than government intervention. One area of the market that is starting to pick up is property. Not in a huge way, but bit by bit. We have seen in, January and February 2010 more commercial building insurance enquiries, for new purchase property, than we saw in the last third of 2009. Spring is traditionally the time for home sales, whereas commercial used to be steady throughout the year.

If you are buying a commercial property, then you are either doing this to rent out, to develop or to occupy yourself. If you are looking to rent, you need to ensure that you not only cover the structure itself, but that you have loss of rental income cover.

This does not mean cover if the tenant defaults, what it covers is if there is a fire, or a flood and your tenant moves out, you receive the equivalent rent from the commercial insurance company until such time as it is let again.

Make no mistake though, in the event of a serious fire your building could take years to get rebuild. Modern industrial units are quicker, due to the natue of materials. Whereas, older established buildings, such as hotels or restaurants will need time.

So, you need to make sure that not only do you have the correct building sum insured, but that you have an adequate loss of rent. As an absolute minimum, you will need 12 months, for many properties though, 18, 24 or 36 months would be more suitable.