Archive for November, 2010

Third party warehouse insurance – make sure you are not paying over the odds.

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010

If you are an internet retailer or wholesaler, you may have your stock stored in a third party fulfilment warehouse. As part of this deal, you may be paying a separate fee to them for warehouse insurance, in respect of your stock.

Many of these premises will charge you, automatically a cost per £1,000 of stock that you store. The amounts that they charge do not tend to differ too much, but if you are storing extremely theft attractive items such as MP3 players or other consumer electronics you may find that they charge you a higher rate than say, for pushchairs. They may have a scale of charges, but in our experience, the premiums they charge are way over what you could obtain from an independent business insurance broker. In addition, they are not providing you with public or products liability. It is just basic cover in case of fire, theft or other “physical loss” perils such as storm.

Whilst we cannot ever guarantee it, for most businesses that operate in this manner, with a turnover less than £100,000 we can usually provide a quote that covers the stock and the liabilities, for a similar price that you are paying for the stock.

The thing to remember is that they cannot force you to take out their own insurance cover. They are entitled to ask you to prove you have alternative cover in place. This is simply a case of us emailing you a standard “proof of cover” letter which, in turn, you can send to the fulfilment warehouse company.

Once they have this proof of cover, they can then stop charging you, what we feel, is too much for your cover. Why is it too much? Usually because there are many mouths to feed. Not only do the insurers get some of the premium but there will be a broker, or maybe two, involved in arranging the policy and the warehouse owner may have some kind of introductory fee. All these amounts add up to a premium that can be too high.

We need to make it clear that not in all cases are you paying too much. Just that in our experience, when customers speak to us about the costs, we feel that they are too high when compared to the open market prices available.

Restaurant insurance – cheaper premiums still available

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010

We are finding, across the board from all our providers, that restaurant insurance premiums are continuing their positive increases seen earlier in 2010.

We have documented in this blog before that all insurers, car, home and business have been underpricing for a few years now. We have seen a few casualties, including the mighty Quinn Insurance that has ceased to underwrite business insurance in the UK.

There have always been competitive issues as far as gaining a foothold in certain insurance markets is concerned. Since 2005, at least three of our main providers, who previously did not underwrite restaurant or takeaway insurance, decided that they would enter the market.

In 2010, one of the main providers of this cover, for ourselves, simply decided that it was not competitive enough for them and pulled out of the market completely.

However, there are still providers out there are prepared to offer competitive prices. Whilst the prices are never going to get to the prices in mid to late 2007, when there was sever competition, you can still get a better prices than your renewal.

Rather than spending hours and hours searching through many different internet sites, you can speak to an independent business insurance broker. A lot of these sites do allow you to input information and after pages and pages, tell you that they cannot compete or that they are unable to quote. There is nothing more frustrating than finding this out time and time again. Whereas, we as a broker, will know straight away as soon as you declare your trade, location, sums insured and renewal premium, whether or not we will be able to get a competitive quote.

Residential property owners insurance – falling aerials

Monday, November 8th, 2010

Given that the UK is waking up today to some terrible weather, we will be expecting a few claims today, storm related.

Not only do storms cause problems with falling trees and branches, there are now an increasing amount of claims for aerials and, more importantly, satellite dishes. Most landlords insurance policies are base, loosely, on a standard home policy. They have extra covers, such as loss of rental income but also have some cover restrictions.

Whilst it is not something anyone does very often, it is always worth checking your policy wording to see exactly what you are covered for. Many flats and apartments are covered under a block of flats insurance policy. Whilst they are essentially residential properties, you do need to check that you have adequate cover. The best way to do this has always been to use  a business insurance broker. The broker earns a fee, or commission for policies that are sold. So, it is in their interests to make sure that you get the widest cover possible.

The part of your wording you need to check is whether you have “falling objects” cover. The chances are that you will, but this may be just aerials. It is a really small point, but you need to ensure that satellite dishes are included as well.

The longer time goes on, the more likely it is that an old satellite dish will be less secure. If it falls off (and, say, hits a parked car) it could be a big claim. Unless it was recently installed, it is unlikely that you could make a claim against the installing firm.

Taking five minutes to check is always worth it, if you do not have it (the cover) speak to your broker.

Commercial building insurance – routine maintenance

Sunday, November 7th, 2010

Check through any commercial building insurance policy and there will be a clause, warranty or wording that states what you should do in the care of the building.

An insurance policy is not designed to replace a normal maintenance contract. You cannot expect to have a building that is not inspected regularly and then have a claim paid against, for example, water leaking through a poorly maintained roof.

You need to consider the policy wording and see whether you have to undertake certain types of maintenance at agreed intervals. One of the main ones is in respect of flat felt roofs. These types of roofs only have a certain lifespan. Even withe advancements since the 1970’s in materials, the more modern flat roofs still get damaged over time.

Many policies will state that you have to have the roof inspected every 6 or 12 months. In addition to this any repairs need to be undertaken immediately and,by an approved repairer. It is no good to say that you inspected the roof yourself. You will need to prove that it was a proper builder or roofer and be able to show receipts that you have paid them to do the work.

Some policies will also have a gutters and drainpipes clause (believe it or not) which again proves that these are cleaned and any debris removed, on a regular basis. This, you can usually do yourself, if you wished. If you had a loss and the adjuster can prove that it was due to build up of leaf mould over many years, then you could potentially be faced with a claim repudiation.

As ever, speak to your business insurance broker and get them to interpret the policy wording for you and ask them to confirm this in writing to you.

Commercial property insurance – glass cover

Saturday, November 6th, 2010

If you are a commercial landlord, you will have in place either single or multiple commercial property insurance policies. In the UK, the vast majority of commercial leases lay responsibility upon the tenant to pay for the annual insurance cover for the building.

Usually this is collected along with the monthly rent, effectively in instalments, or once a year. The tenant does not normally arrange the insurance cover, unless there is a full insuring and repairing lease.

Most commercial leases not only make the tenant responsible for the building insurance, but also say that they are responsible for all fixed glass and sanitary ware (ie toilets and sinks).

This is where things get a little bit confusing. The tenant normally has to arrange their own insurance policy to cover this, rather than relying on the main policy (which they pay as well) to include this. This applies in the main to shops, restaurants, take-aways and pubs, that have by their very nature a lot of glass.

You cannot ordinarily purchase a single policy for glass. They are available, but because many of them are for minimum premiums starting at £500, it is not cost effective for most businesses.

The way to obtain this cover is through a normal business insurance package policy. Most insurers will offer these and there will be a limit within the policy for glass cover. If you have a better policy, this cover is simply unlimited. Other insurers do have a sum insured limit of maybe only £2,000 or £3,000. This may seem a lot when you look at it, but broken windows normally incur an emergency call out cost and, with emergency boarding taken into account, this can cost many hundreds of pounds. Over Bank Holiday weekends, this can double. Most police forces in the UK, if called out to a broken window outside of business hours, will simply appoint a local glazier, with or without your approval.

You need to look at your business premises and work out how much it would cost if somewhere to smash all the external glass (it does happen!) and ensure that you have adequate cover in place.

Commercial property owners insurance – loss of rental income

Friday, November 5th, 2010

Under a standard commercial property owners insurance policy, you will have two main types of cover. The first of these is cover for the actual structure of the building and the second being property owners liability.

In addition to these two, there is one other main type of cover which is not always included as standard. This is for loss of rental income. You can insure, under most policies, for rental income payable or receivable. The main one is rental income receivable. This is where you, or your business own the building and receive rental income.

Your building is insured for certain perils, such as fire, storm, flood and burst pipes. If the building suffers a loss, you many not be able to rent the property out. Of course, it needs to be a substantial loss that renders the property uninhabitable and you would need to prove this to the insurers. Your cover should also apply if you have to agree a reduced rent for your tenant due to inconvenience. For example if they cannot use the whole of the property but do not want to actually move out.

This cover does not apply, in commercial cases, if the tenant simply does not pay their rent. It only covers you if there is an insurable loss to the structure of the building.

When arranging the cover, you will more than likely be dealing with a business insurance broker. One of the questions they will ask is what is the monthly loss of rental income. You will need, in the event of a loss, to prove your received rent over a period of time, say the three preceding months and the same period in the previous year.

The other type of cover, which is seen much less frequently, is loss of rental income payable. This is only found on policies that are arranged by the tenant under a full insuring and repairing lease. This covers exactly the same thing, but because the policy is not in the name of the actual property owner, it cannot cover received rent, but rent payable.

Home office insurance

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

Some of the best businesses in the world started out from humble beginnings. Usually this means working part-time initially, or from a home address. Then, as the business gets bigger and bigger you may choose to do the work full time and move to a commercial premises.

If you are at that start up stage and you are doing an office or non-manual role, you will probably be working from home. Nowadays, there are very few businesses that can trade, in a clerical environment, without any form of technology. This is where you need to consider home office insurance.

If you have a current policy for your house buildings and/or contents, this will be in either your name or joint names if you live with a partner. Therefore, any loss that you suffer, for physical damage to contents, will only be for contents that you, or your partner, have legal ownership of. This is basic stuff, you have a insurance policy for property that you own. You cannot take out a policy on your next door neighbours TV for example, because it is not yours.

Now, think about your home based business. If you buy assets in the name of the business, whether or not it is a limited company, then they are not covered under your house policy. This will be in the name of Mr A Smith, whereas the limited company is in a different name. So, if the business buys a laptop for £2,000 and you drop it, your house insurers will ask fro proof of purchase . When this comes through in the business name, they will not pay the claim.

You can get specialist “business from home” cover, with prices starting around £75 per annum. To get one of these, you will need to speak to an independent business insurance broker. Explain to them how your business is set up, and they will advise you on the legal requirements, if any, and other covers that you can purchase.

Salon insurance – treatment risk

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010

One of the major risks facing beauty salons is for injury caused to customers. If a customer visits and slips over on something that was spilled on the floor, this will fall under the public liability.

If however a customer is having a hair cut or a beauty treatment and is injured, this will be excluded under public liability. What happens is, that most business insurance companies that cover salons, will have a separate section to allow you to “buy back” this treatment cover.

The limits for this cover do not usually mirror the standard liability covers and are restricted to say, £50,000 or £100,000 any one claim. It does not normally add in a huge amount to the premium, standard costs for treatment cover are around £35 per operative per year.

The part that needs to be checked, very carefully, is what treatments are actually covered. For example, we have just provided a quote for a brand new salon that is using various machines to provide IPL, laser and other treatments. None of them are invasive, but they are “heavier” treatments than standard hairdressing, manicures and other beauty treatments.

We quoted a figure, which the customer said was over 50% more than the nearest alternative. We had a range of cheaper quotes, but they were only for restricted treatments. We asked the potential customer to double check whether the alternative included IPL and laser. He checked the salon insurance quote he had got online and, as you have guessed, it did not provide him with the cover he needed. There was no legal obligation on him to take out the cover, but thankfully common sense ruled and he decided to take out the correct cover to protect him.

With the continued rise of no win, no fee solicitors it does not take much for a member of the public top make a claim. They can effectively do this for no cost at all. The solicitor will take up to 35% of any claims settlement. When we are talking £15,000 for someone who alleges their scalp has been injured during a standard hair cut, you can see why it is beneficial to take out this cover. Without it, your business could suffer financially.

Wholealers insurance – minimum security levels

Tuesday, November 2nd, 2010

UK business insurance companies will, in most cases, have a range of products depending on the type of business activities. They do not tend to have a single product that can cater for all types of business. You can get policies specifically designed for anything from pubs and restaurants to churches and schools.

The basic elements of cover are broadly the same, but each type of business will have slightly differing requirements. Other elements are similar, including the security requirements.

If you are looking for, or have just received, a wholesalers insurance quote, you need to look carefully at the whole quote and understand the implications of every part of it. Two of the major risks to wholesalers are damage to stock by ingress of water, either burst pipes or external flooding and secondly, by theft.

Most wholeasalers  have significant amounts of stock and the likelihood of losing all the the stock in one go, as a result of theft, is unlikely. Insurers will insist on certain levels, or types, of security depending on three main factors. The theft attractiveness of the stock, the location of the stock and the individual values of stock. This latter point means that if you have £50,000 of stock, but the single article limit is high, then the chance of a higher loss from a quick “smash and grab” is increased.

Depending on these different factors, they may require intruder alarms, bars or grilles and CCTV. These will be defined in the quote. But, in addition to any additional security, there will be a level of minimum protection, which must be met at all times. You can have the best intruder alarm in the land, but if you do not have good locks on the doors, the protection this provides is reduced.

You will need to look carefully at this minimum security because, if you do not meet it, your claim could be refused. For example, you may have to put in a digital communicator, fully monitored, intruder alarm. If you do this and have a theft, insurers may investigate not only whether you met this “increased” criteria, but also the minimum criteria.

They are quite within their rights to repudiate, or turn down, your claim if you do not comply with all of the security. If you are in any doubt, speak to the business insurance broker that provided you with the quote and/or cover.

Business insurance – what happens with spurious liability claims?

Monday, November 1st, 2010

Within most business insurance policies, you will have, or have the option of having, liability insurance. Certain liability covers, such as employers, are legally required if you have employees.

The other two liability covers, public and employers, are not legally required, although it is sensible and prudent to have these insurances in place. In addition, it may be that you need to have these covers as part of a contract and have to “prove” the cover is in force.

Commercial liability cover will be at a limit of indemnity. This is an amount any one loss or the total of all claims in any one period (usually a year). If it is the total of all claims, this is described as being “in the aggregate”.

For employers liability insurance, the law of the land states that you must have a limit of indemnity at a minimum limit of £5,000,000 each and every claim. Most insurers will give a limit of £10,000,000.

Public and products limits are at whatever amount you choose. The minimum, nowadays, is £1,000,000 going all the way up to many hundreds of millions for, say, a large airport operator.

But what happens if you get, what you consider to be a completely spurious claim which you do not consider will ever be paid? The first thing is, every single claim against you, should be reported directly to your insurer, or to your broker, if you have one.

You should never, ever assume that a claim is not valid and effectively ignore it. Speak to anyone who works in commercial insurance claims and I can guarantee they can recite half a dozen claims that should never have been paid, but where, and for tens of thousands of pounds.

Your policy will include the costs of fending off, or defending claims, whether or not you think they are valid. Report them immediately otherwise insurers could, quite rightly, say that you have jeopardised their chances of defending the claim properly and you may have to contribute, or at worst have no cover.

Just because you report a claim, it does not mean that your premium will go up. Insurers are realistic enough to accept that if you have done all you can to run the business as smoothly as possible and mitigate, or reduce, any risks then they should not increase the premium.

We have just had one claim, for a lady that was drunk, and admitted it, who fell down the stairs in a hotel and broke both her ankles. Her solicitors, who were really quite aggressive, had almost got to the stage of an £80,000 settlement, but a witness was found.

The witness stated that the guest had been effectively drinking like a fish since the wedding (which was at the hotel) had begun. She had not, tripped over the carpet a stated, but had been helped to bed because she was so drunk and decided to pop downstairs for a few more drinks.

The insurers have renewed this policy at the same as last year, give or take a few percent. The claim, although not paid, cost them thousands to defend. In reality, it really was not the hotels fault and the insurers realised this.